Entrar
    Book cover
    Compartilhar
    Editar
    • Sinopse
    • Edições0
    • Vídeos0
    • Grupos0
    • Resenhas1
    • Leitores64
    • Similares0
    Skoob logo

    Saiba mais

    Quem somosTermos de usoFale conoscoCentral de ajudaPrivacidade

    Fique por dentro

    Livros em destaque

    Explore

    LivrosAutoresEditorasLeitoresCortesias

    Siga nas redes sociais

    Baixe o app

    Google PlayApp Store

    Better Never to Have Been - The Harm of Coming into Existence

    David Benatar

    Oxford University Press
    2008
    256 páginas
    8h 32m
    ISBN-13: 9780199549269
    4.3
    10 avaliações
    Leram13Lendo3Querem47Relendo0Abandonos1Resenhas1
    Favoritos2Desejados47Avaliaram10

    Most people believe that they were either benefited or at least not harmed by being brought into existence. Thus, if they ever do reflect on whether they should bring others into existence — rather than having children without even thinking about whether they should — they presume that they do them no harm. Better Never to Have Been challenges these assumptions. David Benatar argues that coming into existence is always a serious harm. Although the good things in one's life make one's life go better than it otherwise would have gone, one could not have been deprived by their absence if one had not existed. Those who never exist cannot be deprived. However, by coming into existence one does suffer quite serious harms that could not have befallen one had one not come into existence. Drawing on the relevant psychological literature, the author shows that there are a number of well-documented features of human psychology that explain why people systematically overestimate the quality of their lives and why they are thus resistant to the suggestion that they were seriously harmed by being brought into existence. The author then argues for the 'anti-natal' view — that it is always wrong to have children — and he shows that combining the anti-natal view with common pro-choice views about foetal moral status yield a "pro-death" view about abortion (at the earlier stages of gestation). Anti-natalism also implies that it would be better if humanity became extinct. Although counter-intuitive for many, that implication is defended, not least by showing that it solves many conundrums of moral theory about population.

    Resenhas (1)Ver mais
    Rosely Garra  picture
    Rosely Garra 11/01/2025Resenhou um livro
    4 (Muito bom)

    Antinatalismo.

    David, basicamente defende a sua ideia através de observações de ângulos pessimistas que nem todos deveriam nascer, que melhor nunca ter existido. Sua tese ganha cor ao se apegar as angústias da vida humana particularmente. Um ótimo livro para concatenar de maneira ponderada suas observâncias. Embora, me trouxe reflexões racionalistas, lógico com muita cautela. Em suma, um bom livro.

    2 curtidas

    Estatísticas

    Avaliações

    4.3 / 10
    • 5 estrelas50%
    • 4 estrelas40%
    • 3 estrelas10%
    • 2 estrelas0%
    • 1 estrelas0%
    David Benatar profile picture

    David Benatar

    David Benatar is professor of philosophy and head of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Cape Town in Cape Town, South Africa. He is best known for his advocacy of antinatalism in his book "Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence," in which he argues that coming into existence is a serious harm, regardless of the feelings of the existing being once brought into existence, and that, as a consequence, it is always morally wrong to create more sentient beings.

    4 Livros
    2 Seguidores

    David Benatar